Can neopterin be a useful immune biomarker for differentiating gastric intestinal metaplasia and gastric atrophy from non-atrophic non-metaplastic chronic gastritis?

INTRODUCTION: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is closely related to pre-neoplastic lesions such as gastric atrophy (GA), gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) and eventually gastric cancer (GC). The diagnosis of GIM and GA is usually based on endoscopic and histopathological features. Nowadays, there are no recognized good serological markers of GIM and GA. Neopterin is an important marker of cellular inflammation. In this study, we aimed to comparatively evaluate C-reactive protein (CRP) and neopterin levels in patients with GIM, GA and chronic gastritis, and to show the increased serum neopterin levels in GIM and GA according to non-atrophic and non-metaplastic chronic gastritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 98 patients with GIM and 68 patients with GA and 70 patients with non-atrophic non-metaplastic gastritis were included in the study. CRP and neopterin levels were assessed in patients and controls. RESULTS: CRP and neopterin levels were significantly higher in patients with GIM and GA than in controls (p<0.05 and p<0.001, respectively). A multiple logistic regression analysis showed that high levels of serum neopterin were positively correlated with GIM and GA. According to the ROC curve analysis, the best cut-off value to differentiate between patients with GIM and/or GA from controls was ≥10.15nmol/l (p<0.001) for serum neopterin levels and ≥1.95mg/l (p<0.001) for serum CRP levels. DISCUSSION: CRP and neopterin levels are significantly increased in GIM and GA. Neopterin may be a useful biomarker and diagnostic test for detecting GIM and GA in clinical practice. CRP levels may be helpful for this observation.

Systematic alphanumeric-coded endoscopy versus chromoendoscopy for the detection of precancerous gastric lesions and early gastric cancer in subjects at average risk for gastric cancer. / Aplicación de la endoscopia sistemática alfanumérica codificada más cromoendoscopia para la detección de lesiones precancerosas gástricas y cáncer gástrico temprano en sujetos con riesgo promedio de cáncer gástrico.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Gastric cancer is one of the main causes of cancer worldwide, but there is currently no global screening strategy for the disease. Endoscopy is the screening method of choice in some Asian countries, but no standardized technique has been recognized. Systematic alphanumeric-coded endoscopy can increase gastric lesion detection. The aim of the present article was to compare the usefulness of systematic alphanumeric-coded endoscopy with conventional endoscopy for the detection of premalignant lesions and early gastric cancer in subjects at average risk for gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, comparative, prospective, randomized study was conducted on patients at average risk for gastric cancer (40-50 years of age, no history of H. pylori infection, intestinal metaplasia, gastric atrophy, or gastrointestinal surgery). Before undergoing endoscopy, the patients had gastric preparation (200mg of oral acetylcysteine or 50mg of oral dimethicone). Conventional chromoendoscopy was performed with indigo carmine dye for contrast enhancement. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive cases (mean age 44.4 ± 3.34 years, 60% women, BMI 27.6 ± 5.82 kg/m2) were evaluated. Endoscopic imaging quality was satisfactory in all the cases, with no differences between methods (p = 0.817). The detection rate of premalignant lesions and early gastric cancer was 14% (6 cases of intestinal metaplasia and one case of gastric adenocarcinoma). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 100, 95, 80, 100 and 96%, respectively, for systematic alphanumeric-coded endoscopy, and 100, 45, 20, 100, and 52%, respectively, for conventional endoscopy. Lesion detection through systematic alphanumeric-coded endoscopy was superior to that of conventional endoscopy (p = 0.003; OR = 12). CONCLUSION: Both techniques were effective, but systematic alphanumeric-coded endoscopy significantly reduced the false positive rate.

Aumento de detección de lesiones gástricas premalignas mediante protocolo Sydney en comparación con biopsias no protocolizadas / Increased detection of premalignant gastric lesions through Sydney protocol in comparison with non-protocolized gastric biopsies

Introduction: Gastric cancer (GC) is the leading cause of cancer mortality in Chile. The development ofgastric adenocarcinoma its preceded by a histopathologic cascade composed of gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia and gastric dysplasia. Sydney protocol has been proposed as the standard method for diagnosingthese conditions. The aim of this research study was to establish whether Sydney protocol increase thedetection of premalignant gastric lesions, as gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia, compared to non protocolizedendoscopies/biopsies. Methods: Upper gastroduodenal endoscopies (GDE) from Hospital Clí-nico Universidad Católica de Chile between April-May 2015 and April-May 2016 was analyzed. Patientswith histological study with 18 years-old or older were included. Patients with history of GC or malignantlesions at GDE where excluded. Detection of gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia and suggestive findingsof autoimmune gastritis where compared between Sydney protocol and non-protocolized endoscopies/biopsies...

Introducción: El cáncer gástrico (CG) es la principal causa de muertes por cáncer en Chile. El desarrollo del adenocarcinoma gástrico es precedido por una cascada histopatológica (gastritis; atrofia gástrica/AG; metaplasia intestinal/MI). Se ha propuesto la biopsia del cuerpo, ángulo y antro a través del protocolo de Sydney para la búsqueda de estas condiciones. Objetivo: Determinar la diferencia en la detección delesiones premalignas gástricas a través del protocolo de Sydney comparado con el estudio endoscópico habitual. Métodos: Se analizaron las endoscopias digestivas altas (EDA) realizadas en el Centro de Endoscopia Digestiva del Hospital Clínico de la Universidad Católica en los períodos entre abril y mayo del 2015 y 2016. Se incluyeron las EDA de pacientes mayores de 18 años con estudio histológico. Fueron excluidos los pacientes con antecedente personal de CG o lesiones de aspecto maligno macroscópicas. Se comparó la detección de AG, MI y gastritis autoinmune (GA) en el estudio histológico entre los pacientes con protocolo Sydney y el estudio endoscópico no protocolizado...